Izabela Heinzova vs Noa Krznaric Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Sep at 11:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Heinzova vs N. Krznaric

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Heinzova 1 - 0 Krznaric
They have played 2 sets in total, with Izabela Heinzova winning 2 and Noa Krznaric winning 0. The last match between Izabela Heinzova and Noa Krznaric was at the W15 Sibenik, 30-09-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Izabela Heinzova getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Heinzova | 1 |
| Krznaric | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W15 Sibenik(09-30-25)
I. Heinzova vs N. Krznaric H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 42.86% (36-48) | Career Total W/L | 51.49% (69-65) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Heinzova vs N. Krznaric Match Preview:
- Izabela Heinzova's recent performance on second serve points is considerably weaker, with a win rate of 20.45%, while Noa Krznaric excels in this area at 42.86%. Could this point to a potential advantage for Krznaric? Likely so.
- In return games, Heinzova has the upper hand on both first and second returns, winning 43.55% and 29.25% respectively, compared to Krznaric's 38.46% and 25.00%.
- Under pressure, Krznaric demonstrates resilience, saving 60.00% of breakpoints, as opposed to Heinzova's 32.43% save rate. This resilience could be critical in close games.
- In overall performance, Krznaric shows a slightly better win record over the past year, with a win rate of 52.94% against Heinzova's 41.18%.
- Heinzova excels on hard courts with a 47% win rate, while Krznaric's optimum surface is clay, dominating with a 52% win rate.
- Both players are evenly matched in tournaments they've participated in, each winning 58.33% of their matches in similar-tier events.
- In terms of opposition faced, Heinzova has competed against players of a higher average rank (124.82) compared to Krznaric's opponents (142.06), possibly indicating more challenging matches.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Heinzova remains undefeated with a perfect record in deciding sets, compared to Krznaric's 67% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (September 29, 2025, UTC):
As we look ahead to this clash between Izabela Heinzova and Noa Krznaric, numerous factors come into play. Krznaric's superior second serve performance and breakpoint saving ability suggest a potential edge in maintaining her service games.
However, Heinzova's stronger return game statistics indicate she may have the aptitude to challenge Krznaric’s serve and score crucial breakpoints. Heinzova's flawless record in deciding sets could also be pivotal should the match reach a critical juncture.
Nonetheless, taking into account recent trends and overall match performance, the slight edge may go to Noa Krznaric due to her better overall win rate and stronger purpose under pressure. Therefore, Krznaric seems to be the more favorable choice to win the upcoming match.
Izabela Heinzova vs Noa Krznaric Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Heinzova vs N. Krznaric H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:11:26 | Average Match Time | 1:11:26 |
| 57% (31/54) | 1st Serve % | 60% (29/48) |
| 61% (19/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (17/29) |
| 65% (15/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (5/19) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 54% (26/48) | Return Points Win % | 37% (20/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Heinzova Recent Matches Played
N. Krznaric Recent Matches Played

I. Heinzova vs N. Krznaric Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42.86% (36/48) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.49% (69/65) |
| 44.09% (82/104) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.97% (158/146) |
| 48.49% (833/885) | Games Win/Loss | 51.22% (1444/1375) |
| 47.06% (8/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 41.94% (26/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.49% (69/65) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 17 | Aces Total | 56 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 178 | Total Double Faults | 383 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 221.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 283.85 |
| 55% (901/1629) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2209/3487) |
| 55% (495/901) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (1272/2209) |
| 37% (270/728) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (509/1278) |
| 47% (92/195) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (198/402) |
| 45% (710/1563) | Return Points Win % | 45% (1486/3305) |
| 23.81% (5/16) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (8/16) |
| 49.21% (31/32) | Futures W/L | 55.45% (61/49) |
| 43% (36/84) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (69/134) |
| 38% (5/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (11/20) |
| 44% (8/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (16/36) |
| 83% (35/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (70/59) |
| 17% (35/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (70/11) |
| 14% (49/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (64/10) |